2018-07-05 #
There is a virulent strain of nihilism spreading in the wild that
postulates that life outcomes are largely predetermined, and little to
no action can be taken to improve it. It may come in various forms, such
as fatalism, race realism, lookism, incel culture, the black pill, all
of which are detestable in mainstream discourse. These are antithetical
to societal values in which actions and morality determine positive
outcomes, which does not take much effort to dismantle. The detractors
have something in common: opposition to nihilism in all its forms is
based on depriving one's will, to manipulate and extract as much value
as possible.
People at every level of the social strata desire like and respect, all
the way down to the lowest levels. These people should be treated with
great caution, due to their deceitful nature. They are more vested in
pretty lies than reality, and interested in conformity at any cost due
to the perceived benefits. This behavior is exhibited by gang members
who demand respect in exchange for not assaulting you, and likewise in
academic con men intellectuals who manufacture acceptable opinions to
have, in exchange for an expensive piece of paper.
The policing of thoughts and imposing self-censorship can be seen as an
attack on one's own sovereignty. People are generally malleable,
subservient, and have an urge to fit in, much more than they are wiling
to admit. Macho posturing serves to delude oneself otherwise. In
previous eras, there may have been evolutionary advantages to belonging
to the tribe, but this is increasingly irrelevant in contemporary,
atomized society. Virtue signalling, obsession with image, parroting
fashionable memes, are desperate attempts to cling on to this vestigial
behavior.
Global fertility rates have been on an irreversible decline, which
correlates with the expansion of the definition of a loser. When society
disenfranchises a large group of losers, they no longer feel obligated
to play by its rules. Humanity has no viable future at this rate, not
even religious fundamentalism can overcome modernity. No amount of moral
posturing will materialize traditional wives and mothers out of thin
air.
The future is antihuman. Capital transmutes human connections into
transactions, people continue to exist only as machines to be used. Love
works as nature intended: a process by which inferior specimens are
culled. Technology accelerates the process of social decay, there can
only be hope after the wholesale destruction of social mores. Technical
solutions would be sufficient: asexual, immortal beings as envisioned by
Houellebecq in The Elementary Particles, artificial wombs, sex robots,
cybernetic bodies without organs.
...skin is coming away in ragged scraps, exposing something beyond
masculinity, beyond humanity, beyond life. Patches of mottled technoderm
woven with electronics are emerging. Daddy and mummy means nothing
anymore. You scrape away your face and step into the dark... — Nick
Land, Meat (or How to Kill Oedipus in Cyberspace)
2018-06-02 #
History has shown that every time, young low-status males are
overwhelmingly responsible for revolution, and that their grievances are
justified. Society must provide value to its lowest members, in order
for it to remain functional. The recent Parkland shooting, Toronto van
attack, and Santa Fe shooting, demonstrate what happens when this
ultimatum is violated. When a society provides marginal to negative
value in return to its lowest constituents, reciprocal behavior can be
expected.
The question should not be why do these “senseless” killings happen, but
rather why they do not happen with more frequency. The proliferation of
high-quality pornography and displacement activities such as video games
have placated the masses of young, low-status males, for whom access to
sex and relationships are more restricted now than ever, and meaningful
work is out of reach. There would be a spree killing every day if not
for this contemporary bread and circuses to appease them. Therefore, it
is no small miracle that the vast majority of low-status males do not
and likely will never seek retribution for their position in life.
However, it is sensational when someone finally snaps and decides to
pump lead into people at the wrong place at the wrong time.
The 2014 Isla Vista killings was a watershed moment in my life. It was
among the first killings which made it clear beyond a doubt that sexual
access was the primary motive. Mainstream narratives may blame his
mental health or gun rights as the cause, but it is evident that the
perpetrator acted in a rational manner and access to firearms was not
even a relevant factor for some of the casualties.
Elliot Rodger was definitively, a sexual loser. The mating game is a
zero-sum game, with winners and losers on each side. For every winner,
there is a loser, but it is worse than that. For every winner, there are
many more losers, since the top males monopolize females, leaving only
leftovers for the majority of males. Hence, Elliot Rodger plays the role
of the everyman, and the antihero to this cultural narrative. In
Amerikwa, with it's violent and warfaring past, killing is just a
cultural pastime, a bloodsport. There is no coincidence that spree
killings are concentrated in this land, which itself was seized forcibly
from its native inhabitants. Violence is in the cultural DNA. That is
how the game is played here: predator, or prey. It's also no coincidence
that Elliot's father was a director on the Hunger Games film, which
depicts young people slaughtering each other.
What has largely been ignored or considered just a footnote, is his
biracial ethnicity. Elliot displays self-loathing for his Malaysian
Chinese half, as evidenced by his revulsion to seeing an Asian male
merely talking to a white female. This contradicted his perceived sexual
dominance hierarchy, with Asians being at the very bottom for males, and
whites at the very top for both males and females. This was not only in
Elliot's head, but subconsciously imprinted by western cultures. He had
internalized self-racism, which is all too common among Asians, male and
female alike. Yet another reason why spree killings do not happen with
more frequency, is many eager, self-hating Asian females willing to
sexually satisfy loser white males. And yet, Elliot Rodger was unable to
capitalize on his (half) white male privilege, which led him to seek
revenge.
I would put forth some (un)popular sentiment that prostitution should be
legalized or that girlfriends should be assigned to low-status males
somehow, but these are merely band-aids applied to a bullet wound, pun
intended. A long-term solution would involve making life better for the
majority of males, but the contemporary Amerikwa has decided to
continually degrade them while attempting to extract more value out of
them. It should be apparent that such an arrangement is not sustainable
over any considerable period of time. I do not condone Elliot Rodger's
actions. However, I understand.